Rona Maynard Let's Talk

Letters from Rona

Why writers need ticked-off readers

RM
APR
27

My friend Nina and I were halfway through lunch when she mentioned the letter in this month's MORE magazine. Top of the page, she said. Headlined "Granny dearest." All about me and the "appalling" attitude I'd shown in my essay on becoming a grandmother. Some reader had her knickers in a knot because I had admitted to some mixed emotions over a toddler's presence in my home all weekend, every weekend. "What really got her going," Nina said, "was that line about Chardonnay and Ella Fitzgerald."

Oh, right! A few months of dining to the Teletubbies theme tune, with the scent of Kraft Dinner in the air, had kindled a burst of nostalgia for Ella. My critic didn't actually call me a spoiled, self-indulgent narcissist with no right to an adorable grandchild, but that's apparently what she was thinking. I put down my fork, stopped in mid-bite by a shiver of something I couldn't name. I just had to see that letter for myself---to meditate on every finger-wagging word and feel the chill of a stranger's judgment.

If you're one of those writers who take stands on incendiary issues, angry letters just prove that you're doing your job. You attract such a clamour of outrage that no single voice gives you pause. Because I write about lessons drawn from ordinary life, I've grown accustomed to more heartening feedback. I keep an overstuffed file of letters, dating back at least 20 years, from readers who say that my words changed their life. "Your article inspired me to leave my abusive husband," a reader will say. Or "When I read that you'd recovered from depression, I realized there was hope for me." Then there's the woman who recognized her family in My Mother's Daughter, shared the book with her sisters and convened a wine-soaked dinner to share the new insights my story had sparked.

It all adds up to the biggest buzz I've known in the storytelling game---and my reward for not choosing a more sensible career, like tax law. I ask you: how many tax lawyers see ongoing proof that their work is brightening a corner of the world?

I might start to get annoyingly complacent if not for my ticked-off readers. Their aggrieved, insistent voices remind me that not everyone shares my take on things. However they frame their complaint, it always seems to have a subtext---a sour, despondent sense of being left behind. When a newspaper excerpted My Mother's Daughter, I received a hectoring e-mail from a middle-aged man who began, "If the only way you can win your competition with your mother is to insult her in print and in public where she can't answer for herself, I feel truly sorry for you."

I was tempted to hit the delete key. But I found myself wondering who this man was, and what had moved him to track me down. Oh, the wonders of Google! He turned out to be an economist and a published author himself. In the virtual exchange that followed, I learned that he hadn't read my book (surprise!). And that he had a very personal reason for taking offense---uneasy relationships with adult children who held grudges against their father. He wrote, "My parents, too, were not perfect, but having now had two kids of my own, I understand my own imperfections are as bad as, or worse than, theirs ever were."

So what about this latest barb from a stranger? After lunch with Nina, I hot-footed it over to the closest newsstand and flipped to the "Granny Dearest" letter. As denunciations go, it was small-time stuff. I'm "in denial," the writer says. I don't understand that children "hold what is dear in life" and "should never be seen as an inconvenience." It struck me that 20 or 30 years ago, this reader might have been at home with small children while I was dropping my son off at day care. That perhaps at some party or other, she'd been asked, "What do you do?", then been cold-shouldered when she said, "I'm a mother." I'll never know for sure but I know this woman has a story. And if I meditate on it, I just might see the glimmer of an idea.

Posted by Rona April 27, 2009 @ 7:00 AM. File in The writing life

 
 

Your comments

Number of Comments  8 responses to "Why writers need ticked-off readers"

 
Comment
Nina Spencer
April 27, 2009 at 1:01PM
 
Rona, another poignantly worded, insightful entry, indeed. Thank-GOODNESS for the odd (no pun intended) ticked-off reader. It sure let's you know you're stirrin' it up out there and creating great debate and dialogue for both women AND men. And thank-goodness, too, that you've kept an over-stuffed file of POSITIVE feedback about your written contributions--dating back 20 years!--to remind yourself, in more tender or professionally fragile half-moments, of the powerful and truly important value of your words. Writers and speakers, managers and leaders in organizations and such, are all PEOPLE, too. And despite their usually well fortified professional egos, nasty, often uninformed feedback and retorts hurt...even if it's just for a day.

So after sincerely contemplating or meditating on the messages of those aggrieved, insistent voices, consider these words I've just discovered from Emerson (what a wise-guy he was, eh?): "Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could. Some blunders and absurdities no doubt crept in; forget them as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new day; begin it well and serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense."

And, by the way, Rona, words you wrote back in May, 1996, inspired ME and changed MY life, and the ripple effect of that piece continues to this very day. So there ya go! :)

Nina
 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 27, 2009 at 2:02 PM
 
Thanks, Nina. I'm feeling so well fortified by your encouraging words that I could shout to ticked-off readers, "Bring it on!" Must make note of those wise lines from Emerson.
 
Comment
Dana McCauley
April 27, 2009 at 9:09PM
 
Good for you! I have to say, that I'm impressed by your attitude. I still have trouble facing the criticisms I sometimes face due to my public persona. I'm fine when people disagree with me on a professional topic but when people get personal I feel the sting.
 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 28, 2009 at 8:08 AM
 
These days people feel free to get brutally personal, don't they? The urge to rant keeps exploding on talk radio and in the blogosphere. It's hard not to flinch.
 
Comment
Helen Wilkie
April 28, 2009 at 2:02PM
 
Well said, Rona (and Nina!)

And I have to add that speakers also need ticked-off audience members, even though we may not appreciate their comments at the time. In my early career I worried more about this than I do now, thanks to someone who once wrote on the feedback sheet, "She should have worn a different colour suit". When I read that I laughed, and recalled my mother's often repeated advice to "consider the source!" If they so far missed my message that they could only criticize my wardrobe, then the loss was more theirs than mine.

Keep telling it like it is, Rona!
 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 28, 2009 at 2:02 PM
 
Well, Helen, at least you weren't running for political office. Then you'd have the whole country critiquing your wardrobe!
 
Comment
Lynne
April 29, 2009 at 1:01AM
 
My Dearest Ms. Maynard and Friends,
This just goes to reinforce the notion that you can't please everyone all of the time, and not everyone is on the same page in life at exactly the same time. Criticisms, like most things negative in this life, cannot be avoided and will come about at some point in time.
After a certain age, I developed a rather thick skin and don't allow negative criticism to bother me any longer. No one else, besides myself , pays my bills, feeds me, or takes care of me in any other capacity, and if they don't like the way I am living or anything else going on in my life, they can literally kiss my behind! When these so called self righteous critics and are financially responsible for me, then they can dictate what goes on in my life.
Opinions are like rear ends, we all have them and each of them are different. Some people have a more intelligent method of getting their opinions across than others. The rest of them come across as illiterate and uneducated wannabes.

 
Comment
Deborah Wilson
April 29, 2009 at 8:08AM
 
I still recall my surprise the first time I heard that the opposite of love is not hate, but rather indifference. That it is neither praise nor criticism a writer should be truly wary of, but silence.

I was further taught any emotional response, voiced positively or negatively, was evidence of a strong connection made. I was told if connecting was my goal when writing in a public forum I should attempt to weigh any resulting praise or criticism evenly. Both were equally correct and incorrect, having in common with memories their own sets of experiential and emotional filters.

I realize I can always use the additional confidence words of praise bring with them, but it is criticism that triggers introspective growth more often than not. Thank you for the reminder today of that important lesson.
 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 28, 2009 at 8:08 AM
 
Well said, Deborah. In my editing days I used to worry when letters and e-mail dwindled---not when readers rose up to lambaste the magazine.
 
Comment
Ellen
April 30, 2009 at 5:05PM
 
I hope you will keep writing about dealing with criticism. It seems to me that silencing ourselves is the way many of us avoid being criticized.
 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM
 
Yes, for sure I'll return to this subject. Hardly anyone talks about it, yet everyone seems to have a story. Fascinating! And revealing.
 
Comment
Mrs. Tarquin Biscuitbarrel
June 19, 2009 at 11:11AM
 
Rona, once again you are taking a wise and most sensible position. When I was a journalist and editor, I could handle letters from aggravated readers by telling myself that they were mad at The Publication rather than at me personally. When criticized for something I'd written under my own name, I had real problems facing what they'd said, frequently crumpling, privately, like a rusty piece of lawn furniture. This was long before Google, but even knowing the personal details about my critic, or attacker, didin't help me much in my larval state.

(My word verification here: feeble. Ha!)

Since all roads lead to Rome, my difficulty in accepting criticism goes back (sigh) to the unceasing hostility I found in my childhood and youth. Criticism was savage, intensely personal, and since all boundaries fluctuated from minute to minute, I was never certain what the response to something I did, said, or was, might be. I continue to work on this. There is something remarkably freeing about writing under a pseudonymous blogging name. In a long talk last week with the one member of my family of origin with whom I have a real , ongoing relationship, I mentioned how easy it was to write as Mrs. Biscuitbarrel, rather than under my maiden or married names.

"Stay Mrs. Biscuitbarrel, then," the wise man advised. Well, for now. When I burst out of my chrysalis, it will be under the name I used to use, my birth name.

Congratulations again on the new grandson. I can't tell you how lucky they are to have you and your husband: real, present, functioning grandparents! I could just smell the Kraft dinner! My children have one pair of grandparents (one since deceased) they see, or saw, on occasion, and everything's fine but remote, and one pair (one member since deceased) that they never saw. That took some explaining. When my middle son, the one with the most finely tuned attenae, was eight, he asked me, "Do you have a father?" I said that I did. "Do we like him?" he persisted.


 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 28, 2009 at 2:02 PM
 
Always a pleasure to hear from you, Mrs. B., under any name whatsoever. I was touched by your son's "Do we like him?" story and hope the day will come when you feel comfortable posting under your real-world name.
 
Comment
m. claudette sandecki
July 02, 2009 at 4:04PM
 
Love this piece, Rona.

When I was first published -- mostly letters-to-the-editor -- I stayed awake nights revisiting every line and word I had mailed off. The teeniest reader criticism floored my ego for weeks.

After years as a columnist, I agree -- if I'm not upsetting somebody, I'm not doing the job I'm paid for. I live by two quotes: "Never ignore or forget any bit of praise for your writing, deserved or not. Praise possesses excellent restorative properties, particularly for the writer of humor." Patrick F. McManus, author of The Deer on a Bicycle: Excursions into Writing Humor. And "If a few people shoot at you, why feel you"re crap?" John Travolta, interviewed on The Actors' Studio.
 
Reply
Rona Maynard
April 28, 2009 at 3:03 PM
 
Thank you, Claudette, for your columnist's perspective. Looking over all of these comments, I'm struck by two themes that connect them. Most of you have felt wounded by criticism (perhaps to the point of obsessing over it) but you've also found words of wisdom that keep you centred when you're feeling put-upon.
 
  1. You are welcome to leave a comment here.
  2. I may respond occasionally but if I don't please don't be offended.
  3. Be nice!

Your turn

Name (required)

URL (optional)

Email (required, but will not be published)

Comment:

Please re-type the word shown above.  (If you can't read it click here)

 

  Remember my name and email for next time
  Notify me if there are any follow-up comments